Multicultural Diversity
Assessment Dissemination Project

Evaluation of University Objectives

Rubric scores by area and individual rubric factor

for each institution for year 1.

Click here for Rubric on Infrastructure Areas (Strands)

Area

Rubric Factor

University (by ID#)

Factor

Avg.

 

#1

 

#2

 

#3

 

#4

 

#5

 

#6

 

#7

 

#8

 

#9

 

#10

Partnerships & Programs

Unit-Wide Commitment to accountability

 

4

 

NE

 

2

 

2

 

4

 

NE

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

3

 

3.0*

Process for performance assessment development

 

2

 

4

 

2

 

3

 

3

 

NE

 

2

 

4

 

4

 

3

 

3.0*

 

Accreditation & Objectives

Assessment system based on conceptual frameworks and professional and state standards

 

3

 

4

 

2

 

2

 

3

 

NE

 

2

 

3

 

NE

 

3

 

2.75*

 

Assessment & Data

Electronic data system

 

NE

 

NE

 

NE

 

NE

 

1

 

NE

 

NE

 

NE

 

NE

 

3

 

2.0*

Assessment system includes comprehensive and integrated measures

 

2

 

2

 

1

 

2

 

2

 

2      

 

2

 

2

 

1

 

2

 

1.8

Measures monitor candidate progress, and manage and improve operations and programs

 

3

 

3

 

1

 

3

 

3

 

3

 

2

 

3

 

1

 

3

 

2.5

Data collected at admissions, transition points, and program completion and predict candidate success

 

3

 

3

 

1

 

3

 

3

 

4

 

2

 

3

 

1

 

4

 

2.7

Steps taken to establish fairness, accuracy, and consistency of assessments

 

2

 

3

 

3

 

NE

 

3

 

2

 

2

 

4

 

3

 

3

 

2.5*

Assessment data shared with candidates for reflection and improvement

 

2

 

NE

 

NE

 

NE

 

3

 

3

 

NE

 

4

 

1

 

3

 

1.6*

Assessment data shared with faculty for reflection and improvement

 

3

 

2

 

NE

 

3

 

3

 

3

 

NE

 

4

 

2

 

2

 

2.2*

Multiple assessments provide regular and comprehensive information on candidate performance at each stage of program

 

4

 

4

 

1

 

3

 

4

 

3

 

1

 

4

 

2

 

4

 

3.0

 

Institutionalization

Accountability system coordinator

 

3

 

2

 

1

 

NE

 

2

 

NE

 

1

 

2

 

2

 

4

 

1.7*

Process for using data for program improvement

 

3

 

3

 

2

 

NE

 

3

 

4

 

NE

 

3

 

2

 

3

 

2.3*

Multiple assessments provide regular and comprehensive information on program quality at each stage of program

 

3

 

3

 

1

 

NE

 

2

 

4

 

2

 

4

 

NE

 

4

 

2.3*

Candidate and graduate performance data used to evaluate efficacy of courses

 

3

 

2

 

2

 

NE

 

2

 

3

 

3

 

3

 

NE

 

3

 

2.1*

 

NE= No Evidence provided at time of this report.  Subsequent site visits and institutional reports needed.

* Note: NE not included in calculation of average scores.

 



Please feel free to email Dr. Anthony Ambrosio, if you have any concern about the grant. Thank you.

Original website designed by Marcos A. Prono and Sarah J. Stump revised by John W. Parton.
Last revision: Oct. 2006