|
Assessment Dissemination Project |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Report
Abstract The Multicultural/Diversity Lesson Plan Requirement is designed to evaluate a student teachers ability to construct a lesson plan with multicultural/diversity (MCD) learning objectives. Teacher education seniors are required to submit the lesson plan after student teaching. Students must also write: a description of the class and content area, a list of multicultural/diversity learning objectives, rationale to support why their lesson is an example of an "inclusive teaching strategy for a diverse classroom," and a description of services they did or would provide for students who spoke English as a second language. This report presents the lesson plan evaluation component, the lesson plan rubric and the evaluation results from three semesters (n=361) of data collection. Results indicated that approximately 50% of teacher education candidates demonstrated at least minimal skills in creating a meaningful multicultural/diversity lesson plan. Implications for teacher training are discussed. History and Background Lesson planning is considered a vital component of the preservice teacher's training (Sullivan & Panasuk, 1998; Armstrong & Savage, 1994) and receives strong emphasis throughout teacher education programs. Yet, an examination of literature revealed a lack of formal evaluation procedures (including the use of rubrics) for MCD lesson plans. The closest evaluative discussion was a description of characteristics of culturally relevant curriculum (Abdal_Haqq, 1994) that stressed integrated and interdisciplinary culturally relevant activities as opposed to one-time activities. The purpose of this report is to present a more formal, meaningful lesson plan evaluation procedure. The Teachers Colleges Office of Professional Educational Services requires its students to complete a MCD lesson plan as a part of forty assignments on public school policies and procedures. In the past, lesson plans were reviewed without any formal, structured evaluation procedure. In addition, no learning standards or targets had been identified with which to base a structured evaluation. The result was some uncertainty as to whether students could construct a meaningful MCD lesson plan. During the Spring 1999 semester, however, several members of the ESU Project 30 committee (Eileen Hogan, Marie Miller, Anthony Ambrosio) convened to revise the lesson plan requirement instructions (Competency #19 in the Professional Relations of Teachers Handbook), and to create a rubric evaluation tool based on identified learning standards. Participants Participants were 361 student teachers (84 males, 277 females; 310 elementary, 51 middle/secondary) in their senior year (average age 23.50). Reported ethnicities were: 93.1 % Caucasian, 2.0% Native American, 1.3% African American, 1% Hispanic, less than 3% multiracial (checked more than one category). Approximately 53% indicated they grew up in a small town or rural area, 24% in a city (population > 50,000), and 24% in a suburb or a small city (population < 50,000) . Seniors submit their lesson plan after completing 650 hours of student teaching. Students in this sample did not have access to the rubric to use as a guideline (i.e., baseline data gathering). Student scores were not used to prohibit graduation or require remediation. Instrumentation A multicultural/diversity lesson plan was already a program requirement, but was revised to match the performance outcomes of the assessment project (see Appendix A). Student teachers were asked to create a lesson plan that "delivers a multicultural/diversity objective while employing an inclusive teaching strategy or strategies for a diverse classroom." Students had to provide additional information along with their lesson plan including: a description of the class and content area, multicultural/diversity objectives, rationale to support why their lesson was an example of an "inclusive teaching strategy for a diverse classroom," and a description of services they did or would provide for students who spoke English as a second language. A four (4) factor rubric (see Appendix B) was constructed and tested on the lesson plans collected over two semesters. The rubric was revised for clarity (i.e., inter-rater reliability) and to better match the natural developmental progression found in the data. Lesson plans were collected for an additional semester and then all lesson plans were scored in accordance with the revised rubric. Inter_rater reliabilities for each rubric factor ranged from .83 to .89. Holistic exemplars (i.e., whole lesson plan examples) for three basic ability levels (unsatisfactory, developing and proficient) are provided in Appendix C. Analytic exemplars for all levels of each of the 4 rubric factors can be found in Appendix D. Separate examples for elementary education and middle/secondary education are provided in both of these appendices. After training, lesson plans required an average of 20 minutes each to evaluate. The entire content of the lesson plan and the answers to assignment questions were considered when scoring each rubric factor (i.e., holistic scoring). In order to better interpret the rubric and evaluation results, a brief narrative description of each rubric factor is given below: Factor 1: Lesson Plan Objectives This factor evaluated a student teacher's ability to design a meaningful multicultural lesson. Low scores usually indicated that the student omitted a multicultural objective or used a trivial objective (e.g., food day, or making beads). Often the multicultural component appeared to be an add_on to an existing plan just to meet the requirement. Higher scores were awarded if MCD objectives were more central to the lesson, engaged attitudes and beliefs, and went beyond factual information. At the proficient level, the lesson plan synthesized personal reflection, addressed developmental adaptations, and included skills relevant outside the classroom. About half the student teachers addressed meaningful MCD objectives. Of those, about one_third used critical thinking strategies. The focus on facts and use of trivial objectives were main causes for low scores. Factor 2: Lesson Plan Mechanics This factor evaluated the ability to synthesize lesson plan objectives with classroom activities and assessments. Low scores represented weak or non_existent links between these components. This usually occurred because student teachers omitted assessment, assessed informally, evaluated by single means, or with a select group of their students. High scores represented stronger, multiple, and inclusive activities and assessments. About half of the students earned developing or proficient scores, mainly because they did not assess beyond the knowledge level. Factor 3: Lesson Plan Rationale This factor evaluated a student's ability to competently explain why their lesson plan was multicultural and inclusive. Low scores indicated the misconception that a MCD lesson employed culturally stereotyped activities (e.g., making teepees). While "developing" scores acknowledged diversity, "proficient" scores included societal perspectives. Again, results indicated that about half of the students earned scores in the developing and proficient range. The use of stereotypical activities was the major reason for low scores on this factor. Factor 4: Lesson Plan Inclusiveness This factor evaluated the ability to provide inclusive teaching strategies, especially to individuals whose primary language was not English. Low scores conveyed no adaptations or the single approach of: "Get an ESL tutor." Lesson plans with a "developing" score reflected more responsibility for addressing student needs, typically with varying instructional strategies. A "proficient" lesson plan promoted the classroom as a community of learners with multiple learning styles. Only a small proportion of lesson plans achieved proficiency. Results Evaluation results are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Results indicated no practically significant differences on rubric factor mean scores (no differences exceeded .50) between testing times (e.g., Spring semester vs. Fall semester), or between emphasis areas (elementary vs. middle/secondary). Generally, rubric scores were approximately normally distributed for all rubric factors. However, since this is a criterion_referenced assessment (i.e., there is a benchmark score) it is expected that students would score in the developing or proficiency range on all rubric factors. Inspection of Table 1 indicates that approximately half of all respondents scored below this competency on each rubric factor. The total lesson plan group mean score fell below the total rubric score mid-point. In summary, results indicated that half our student teachers demonstrated minimal skills in creating multicultural/diversity lesson plans. Common themes contributing to low scores included: approaching the lesson plan requirement by "adding on" a multicultural component as an afterthought, omitting assessment, limiting assessment options, targeting learning at knowledge (factual) levels, using trivial or stereotypical activities, and not personally addressing ESL needs. Sample scores differ slightly from those obtained from 40 "multicultural lesson plans" randomly selected from an internet search. While project lessons had a slightly higher mean score for "mechanics," internet samples showed slightly higher mean scores for "objectives" content and, especially, for "inclusiveness" factors (1.5 point mean difference). Omitting or using limited assessments was the only deficit consistently found in both samples. 1. Descriptive Statistics for Lesson Plan Rubric (Factors 1 to 4) by total
group and by emphasis area.
Table 2. Description Statistics for Lesson Plan Rubric (Factors 1 to 4) by testing time.
Discussion & Critical Analysis Overall, the students did fairly well given their experience level as student teachers and the resources available to them. It would be surprising if most new graduates performed at the "proficient" level. Graduating teachers need more experience to perfect the skills necessary to serve diverse populations and build inclusive curriculum. As with most teacher preparation programs, we are driven by state requirements for licensure and national guidelines for accreditation. Currently, there is no ESL/LEP requirement for certification in Kansas, nor is there a specific indicator in national guidelines. Given that reality, and the packed schedules of most students, it is unlikely for students to take an ESL course unless they are pursuing an ESL concentration. This could help explain the low scores on adapting lesson plans for children whose first language is not English or for children with disabilities. Most of the student teachers are assigned to settings with children from diverse backgrounds; but with the popularity of "pull out" programs, they may not observe classroom accommodations. Or, accommodations may come so naturally to a veteran teacher that they are not communicated to the student teacher. However, national accreditation guidelines do have requirements for inclusion and multicultural education. Because our program infuses multicultural education and inclusion strategies, no separate multicultural education course is required, and the required survey of exceptionalities course does not include methods. The results of this project may suggest that our students do not learn to use strategies for adaptation of instruction for children with special needs. Some of these scores may be explained by the demands placed on the student teacher. In addition to all the classroom responsibilities inherent in this capstone semester, students must also complete forty assignments on public school policies and procedures, including the multicultural lesson plan assignment. Admittedly, most student teachers may focus their energies on classroom success. Likewise, university supervisors may focus their attention on classroom performance, rather than on successful completion of forty assignments. Thus, lesson plans received varying attention by the student teachers. Some conscientious students did quite well, while others just made the attempt. We expect scores to improve once students have access to the rubric to use as a learning tool and as a benchmark to judge potential classroom resources (e.g., internet, resource books, etc.). Recommendations The lesson plan requirement is not intended at a sole means of program or student evaluation and should be used in conjunction with other assessments. Predictive validity can and should be established by correlating lesson plan scores with observation scores during student teaching. This can be done with a select sample to reduce obtrusiveness. Continuing to involve faculty, P-12 teachers and student teachers in updating the lesson plan rubric is crucial to the validity of the assessment. It is strongly recommended that this assessment rubric be used as a learning tool to promote student growth. It can be placed in the Professional Relations of Teachers handbook along with the lesson plan assignment. It should also be made available to teacher education faculty to infuse into their courses. *Special thanks to thank Cynthia Eckles and Tony Juve for their evaluation efforts References Abdal-Haqq, I. (1994). Culturally responsive curriculum.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED370936) Appendix A Lesson Plan Instructions (Competency #19 in the Professional Relations of Teachers Handbook)
Competency 19-Multicultural Diversity Multicultural Lesson Planning. This competency is concerned with your ability to identify a lesson plan that delivers a multicultural/diversity objective while employing an inclusive teaching strategy or strategies for a diverse classroom. Your task is to:
Appendix B Lesson Plan Rubric Factor 1: Lesson Plan Objectives--(Content of Objectives & Question #2)
Factor 2: Lesson Plan Mechanics-- (Objectives supported by lesson plan activities and matched to assessments...(i.e., Obj--Plan--Assess link)
Factor 3: Lesson Plan Rationale (Question #3 What makes this a multicultural/diversity objective?)
Holistic Exemplars
Elementary Lesson Plan (#1053877) A. Getting students ready for the lesson. Outcome: The students will discover through research how different cultures
celebrate Christmas. B. Instructional input and divergent questions to ask students. -What cultures interest you the most? C. Evaluation. -Ask students to restate the objectives. Secondary Lesson Plan (#1053844) Periodic Table of Elements Project This project will be worth 50 points. Description of the project: Each member of the group will be required to write a paper. The paper should be 2-3 typed pages, double spaced and 12 point type. The paper needs a bibliography page with at least two different resources. The paper will be graded on the Six Trait writing method. The papers should contain: Plagiarism: to steal or pass off (the words or ideas of others) as ones own. Any Plagiarism will result in an automatic zero!!!!!!! The oral presentation and the poster or visual aide will be a group effort and you will receive a group grade. Oral Presentation 3-5 minutes Poster or Visual Aide Be Creative: The project is designed to better familiarize you with the Periodic Table and to give you a better understanding of the uses for certain elements. This project will also work on your ability to work with others and will also give you the opportunity for oral presentation. This project is designed for you to enjoy, you can be as creative as you want for your presentation and poster. You will be given one class period for research and work time. GOOD LUCK Competency 19-Multicultural Diversity The class is a high school chemistry class. The class is made up of six boys and five girls. This project is to give the students a break from the traditional class work. Purpose: To better familiarize the students with the Periodic
Table. It will also give the students a chance to learn about different parts of the
world. Elementary Lesson Plan (#1053804) Mexican Calacas Entry: Discuss the use of the Mexican calacas in Mexico's celebration of 'Los Dios De Las Muertes' Ask questions pertaining to the students recent studies dealing with Mexico, the migration of the Monarch butterflies and its relationship to this storied festival. Lesson Outcome: Students will develop an understanding of the word Calacas as it relates to the Mexican culture. Students will develop and label the various parts of a human skeleton. Instructional Input: Students will be paired into groups of four, working collaboratively to develop a life size human skeleton. The students will be required to share ideas of how best to present what action pose they will have their skeleton in. They will demonstrate the ability to work as a team cutting, gluing and labeling there calacas. Goal: The goal of this assignment is for the students to gain an understanding of the cultural celebration of a Mexican holiday. Also too, the students will gain a deeper understanding of the Human body. Rewards: Students will have the opportunity to display there works in the hallways of the elementary school. Resource Interdependence: Either I or the classroom teacher will be available as a resource. The students will also be encouraged to ask their peers to help answer any questions. Assigned Roles: Each group of students will elect there own leaders or work in a system that divides up the tasks equally. Verbal Interactions: This will occur during the development of the solution to each problem. Size of Group: They will be in groups of four Individual accountability: this is easily observed throughout the lesson by walking around and talking to each group. Skill Taught: To learn social communicational skills through answering and reflecting upon ideas presented within a small group. Evaluation: Students will be questioned at the end of the assignment as to what it was they were working on, the significance of the assignment, and How they may apply this situation to another assignment in art, science, or history. The teacher will continually ask questions and reflect verbally to each group how he or she thinks each group is doing in their presentation of the assignment. Closure: Students will be asked as a class to discuss their ideas and how those ideas relate to their classroom activities dealing with Mexico. Cooperative learning lesson reflection This lesson was an excellent introduction for me on how to implement a cooperative learning situation. Though each class approached the proposed problem in a different way, the outcome of the assignment was the same. Most students seemed to take with them some knowledge of the skeletal system, the context of the assignment( Los Dias de Los Muertes ), and most importantly the ability to function successfully, through collaboration in a group learning situation. This assignment was fairly easy to present because the students had already had some knowledge of the Mexican holiday discussed in the lesson. This tie in with what the classroom was already studying, made for an excellent collaboration technique that I feel only increases the learning g place in the classroom. The size of the project (life size) was definitely adequate for what it was the students were doing. Working in groups of four it provided an art experience developed on a monumental scale, something the students all to often do not have the chance to experience. Secondary Lesson Plan (#2053636) Lesson Topic: Early 1900's in Kansas Objective1. Students will recognize and identify reasons for KKK growth in Kansas in the early 1900's 2. Students will explain the differences and similarities among all people. Instructional Input-Modeling 1. Lecture - p. 131 -132. Guided Practice As a class, we will brainstorm all the similarities among class members. Next, we will brainstorm all the differences. We will then compare and determine if our similarities outnumber our differences. Checking for Understanding Students will find a partner and discuss their differences with one another. Then, the students will work together to find a solution as to how to educate people about living peacefully among peoples of different colors, races, etc. Closure I will emphasize that, we as a society, are still educating ourselves about the beauty of cultural diversity. Answers to Questions 1. The lesson regarding the KKK and possible solutions to overcoming such prejudices would be taught to an 8th grade level class. The class hopefully would be made up of students from varying racial backgrounds, religious faiths, and of course, different genders. 2. The multicultural/diversity objective is having the students identify and explain the impact of racial differences (including those among class members) and racial intolerance. In addition, the students will also outline possible ways we, as a society, may live more harmoniously together. 3. This is a multicultural/diversity objective because it not only recognizes past racial intolerance, but also celebrates the differences among people of different cultures and races and encourages students to think about we may live more peacefiay with one another. 4. This is an inclusive teaching strategy because it capitalizes on the differences among students in the classroom. The students must discover their differences while still developing solutions to five more harmoniously as a society. 5. Hopefully, an interpreter would be available to translate during my lecture. I would certainly pay close attention to non-English speaking students to determine if they needed further instruction or explanation regarding the content of the lesson. I also might try to use demonstration - that is, physically demonstrate differences among students in the class. Elementary- Secondary Lesson Plan (#1054916)
Grade: 4th- 8th Materials: vision simulators and sensory kits for stations from Special Ed. Coop, Braille story books, bandannas, vet wrap. Objectives: Students will be able to identify several ways in which developmentally disabled people are the same as and different from themselves. Students will be able to identify language that can be dehumanizing to people with impairments and be able to use appropriate language to describe developmental disabilities. Students will be able to identify typical stereotyping through simulations and write about their feelings listing the things which they had to adapt for and found difficult, to broaden their understanding of impairment difficulties through personal experience. Anticipatory Set: Students will answer a set of true and false questions related to kids with disabilities. 1. All kids with disabilities need to be in special schools. 2. Kids who can't talk are mentally retarded. 3. People with disabilities like being with other disabled people better than with nondisabled people. 4. Disabilities are a disease. They are contagious. 5. People who are blind have better hearing than most people do. 6. People who have mental retardation can learn to do many things. 7. People with disabilities don't want people to feel sorry for them but want to be treated like everyone else. 8. It is not polite to ask people about their disabilities. They would rather not talk about the subject. Communicate Objective: How many of you have been teased about something you have no control over. You get called names or get poked fun of because of something you did of said or just because you might be a bit different than the others. In appropriate language and stereotyping labels really hurt others feelings. We will identify language that can be hurtful to people with impairments and learn how to show them the same respect and dignity as anyone else. We will also try to put ourselves in their shoes for a short time to see how we handle difficulties and how others react toward us. Teacher Input: Answer true and false questions for students. 1. False - Just like you, children with disabilities need to be in the best learning environment possible. It is possible for all disabled children to be integrated into a regular school setting. 2. False - Speech impairment often is caused by damage to the vocal chords, stroke, deafness, or cerebral palsy - causes that do not necessarily affect intellectual functioning. 3. False - Most people with disabilities prefer being with both non-disabled and disabled people. The greatest need it to be accepted as a person like everyone else. 4. False - Some disabilities can be caused by disease. Others are the result of an accident, genetic factors, prenatal damage, or a number of unknown causes. 5. False - When a person id deprived of one sense, he/she learns to compensate by relying on other senses for perception. Blind people do not have a better hearing mechanism, but have developed better or more sensitive hearing skills. 6. True - Because a person has mental retardation does not mean that he/she can't learn. It does mean that often he/she cannot learn as quickly and often needs special help to learn new things. 7. True - People with disabilities do want to be treated like everyone else. Pity does not help people feel good about themselves. Most people with disabilities want other people to learn to accept their disability as they have and then to help them get on with living life to the fullest. 8. False - Most people with disabilities would rather explain their handicapping condition and help people understand it rather than have people stay at a distance because they don't understand. There are polite ways of asking a person about his/her disability. Describe for the students the difference between disability (the limitation imposed by a physical or mental impairment) and handicap (the limitations imposed by society's reaction to disability). One of the biggest slogans for the National Association for Retarded Citizens is "Your attitude is my biggest handicap." Discuss with students how society has viewed people with impairments as dehumanizing using stereotypes that diminish self-esteem. Guided Practice: Make a chart of the board of appropriate words and
inappropriate words when talking about people with impairments. Discuss feeling or other
types of negative connotations that may go along with these words.
Check for understanding: Independent Practice: Divide students into groups by numbering them off for each station. Allow 7 to 1 0 minutes for each station. Vision Station: Objectives: · identify objects by using senses other than vision · brainstorm ways of assisting blind students Materials: blindfolds, pencil, and paper, items to simulate other four senses.Activities: Name the five senses. What disability does a person have who has limited vision. Blindfold participants and present one item form each sense area. Make sure that each student has had a chance to experience all four sense areas. Tell students to raise their hands when they have identified their item to be given the next one. When all items have been presented, have participants remove their blindfold. Have them write how they felt during the activity. Stress the ways blind people can compensate for loss of vision with other senses. Have them think of ways a blind or severely visually impaired student could function in this school and ways in which they could make the building and classroom more accessible for these students. Communication Station Objectives: Name and give examples of several verbal and nonverbal communication systems used by most people. Identify ways to communicate by using alternative communication systems. Materials: paper and pencil, cards telling students what they need to communicate to each other with out speaking. Activities: Have students write down ways in which we communicate with each other.(ex.
Facial expressions, gestures, signals, etc.) If you wrote a message on a piece of paper
would... Test 1 - Put objects in a pile. Give them at least 15 objects and about 15
seconds to look at them. Cover the objects. Tell them to write down all the items they
saw. Watch Your Language! Afflicted - Very negative and a definite downer! Person who has or is affected by is much better. Cerebral Palsie - Sounds like an inanimate object instead of a person. Why not person or people with cerebral palsy. C.P. - OK to describe the condition but not a person. This puts
all people in a neat little package and deposits them in a file drawer. Please use who
has or who have cerebral palsy when referring to people. How Society has Viewed Disabled People Over the ages, disabled persons have been dehumanized in many different ways. Some of
the stereotypes, which have been used to label disabled people, persist in the mind of the
public even today. Viewing a disabled person or group of disabled persons according to a
stereotype limits what we expect of them and how we respond to them. This should become
clearer as we discuss some of the "historical" stereotypes. Secondary Lesson Plan (#1054868) Proficient Score (12-16) Competency 19 - Multicultural Diversity Brief description of lesson: Multicultural/diversity objective: What makes this a multicultural/diversity objective?: What makes this an example of an inclusive teaching strategy for a
diverse classroom? Given your lesson plan and content, what services did or would you
provide for non-English speaking students in this classroom? Multicultural Diversity lesson A. Getting students ready for the lesson "Don't Laugh at Me" I'm a little boy with glasses Don't laugh at me I'm the cripple on the corner Don't laugh at me Group members names: Author: Date: Block: What is your group's reaction to this piece? In what ways are the people in the story like each of you? What kind of emotional reaction does the piece prompt in each of you? What lesson can we learn from the piece? List similarities you find between the characters in the story and you:
Appendix D Analytic Exemplars
FACTOR #1: Content of Objective Although the entire lesson plan was considered as a whole when scoring each individual factor, the following excerpts could be indicators or evidence that a student-teacher may be functioning at this level. Description of an Incomplete Score: The student teacher has an objective, but the objective is not applied with a multicultural interest. The student teacher may have had a lesson plan already established and appears to merely "add-on" to make it appear multicultural. They may not have developed the lesson plan with a multicultural intention. They may not have intended to develop the lesson plan with a multicultural emphasis at the onset. Example #1: A student teacher who wants: "To relate the culture of the Hispanics to math class." Target population: Secondary Example #2: A student-teacher who wants to "allow the ESL students a chance to show off their heritage and share their knowledge." Target population: Elementary Although the entire lesson plan was considered as a whole when scoring each individual factor, the following excerpts could be indicators or evidence that a student teacher may be functioning at this level. Description of an Unsatisfactory Score: The student teachers lesson plan has a multicultural interest, but it is either: a) not of significant importance, or b) is trivial (e.g., food day or making beads). The lesson plan does not actively involve students and is merely teaching factual information rather than beliefs or skills applicable to human interaction. The lesson plans that contained stereotypes or bias in the content also earned an unsatisfactory score. Example #1: A student teacher who wants to "allow the students to see how Black Americans have impacted their lives." Target population: Elementary Example #2: A student teacher who wants learners "to understand the culture of the Renaissance time and to develop an appreciation for the connection that can be seen between literature, music, art, and religion." Target population: Middle-Secondary Education Although the entire lesson plan was considered as a whole when scoring each individual factor, the following excerpts could be indicators or evidence that a student teacher may be functioning at this level. Description of a Developing Score: The student teachers objectives clearly focus on multicultural interests and is a central part of the lesson. The lesson plan begins to incorporate student attitudes and beliefs. However it still only communicates factual information of cultures, and lacks the synthesis of reflection and thought required to globalize the material for human interaction applications. Example #1: A student-teacher wants to "address a culture that is different
than that of the majority of the class [Mexico]." Example #2: A student teacher in physical education wants learners to "be knowledgeable in the history of sports played in other parts of the world." Target population: Secondary Although the entire lesson plan was considered as a whole when scoring each individual factor, the following excerpts could be indicators or evidence that a student teacher may be functioning at this level. Description of a Proficient Score: The student teacher has a clear, original, MC focus and it is a central part of the lesson. The objectives are elevated above factual information to include active involvement of students, and apparent efforts are made to overcome stereotypes and group/culture bias. The information is used and shared with classmates and potentially through outside interactions, or synthesizes personal reflection and thought. Some lesson plans placed in this category also included developmental adaptations. Example #1: A student teacher wants students to "take a common thread and allow each child to share with the group... to help build community and celebrate similarities and differences." Target population: Elementary Education Example #2: A student teacher who wants "to increase communication between group members through a survival activity following a lesson on the Diary of Anne Frank. Target population: Secondary
FACTOR #2: Lesson Plan Mechanics Although the entire lesson plan was considered as a whole when scoring each individual factor, the following excerpts could be indicators or evidence that a student teacher may be functioning at this level. Description of an Incomplete Score: The student teacher has not followed the prescribed lesson plan format ( one of the following is missing from his/her lesson plan: objective, content, procedure, evaluation/assessment). The student teacher may not have adequately addressed the objective, content, procedure and evaluation/assessment link within the lesson plan. Example #1: The student-teacher addresses the objective and procedure, but does not include an evaluation or assessment component in the lesson plan.
Example #2: The student teacher addresses the objective and procedure, but does not include an evaluation or assessment component in the lesson plan. Target population: Elementary Education Although the entire lesson plan was considered as a whole when scoring each individual factor, the following excerpts could be indicators or evidence that a student teacher may be functioning at this level. Description of an Unsatisfactory Score: There is a weak or unclear link between the objective, activity, and assessment. The assessment is cursory or inaccurate and only a few students are assessed (e.g. asking only the group leaders about understanding). The objectives are vague and difficult to measure. Example #1: The student teacher reads to the students to teach them about the life struggles of slaves (a vague and somewhat difficult objective to measure). The assessment is not in-depth (i.e., calling on students), not connected with the objectives (i.e., increasing awareness) and it is limited in scope (i.e., only assessing some students). Target population: Elementary Education Assessment Component: "I will then call on a student to finish the story." Example #2: The student teacher gives a vague evaluation procedure. The objective is cursory and lacks insight into cultural diversity. The student teacher discusses skin color, but not what it means to each student or to society. The assessment, thus, does not encourage the student to search for individual meaning with the information. This is a case where there is a partial connection between the objectives/activity/assessments (i.e., it could earn the next higher score), but the pedagogy lacks meaning and the assessment produces little insight about student understanding, especially on an individual basis. Target population: Elementary Education Although the entire less | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||